US Senate rejects Biden's $110.5 Billion aid plan for Ukraine, Israel
The US Senate voted against President Joe Biden's proposed supplemental funding bill, which allocated $110.5 billion in aid for Ukraine and Israel.
The bill failed to garner the required 60 votes in favor, with unanimous opposition from Republicans. Notably, even independent Senator Bernie Sanders, typically aligning with Democrats, expressed reservations about funding Israel's military strategy and voted against the bill.
The Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, voted "no" on procedural grounds, emphasizing the need for revision.
Following the vote, Schumer underscored the gravity of the situation, describing it as a "serious moment with lasting consequences for the 21st century." He urged against risking the decline of Western democracy.
President Biden had issued a warning before the vote, emphasizing the historical significance and urging against allowing Russian President Putin to gain an advantage.
Democrats argued that supporting allies and promoting global democracy is crucial in countering autocracies, and rejecting the bill would send a message of non-alignment with international partners.
In contrast, Republicans stood united in their opposition, citing priorities such as stricter immigration policies and southern border control. They emphasized the need for increased accountability for American taxpayer money directed overseas.
Schumer, aiming to break the deadlock, indicated plans to propose an amendment related to border policy. The funding dispute has been a prolonged point of contention between Democrats and Republicans, focusing on the allocation of billions in aid for Ukraine and Israel to safeguard US interests in the Indo-Pacific region and provide international humanitarian assistance.
The resolution of the deadlock came with the elimination of aid from the new budget plan. Notably, resistance remains, particularly among Republicans, regarding increased military aid to the Kyiv government.
The rejection of Biden's aid plan underscores the ongoing challenges in achieving bipartisan consensus on crucial international funding issues.