In Nigeria, lawyers question relevance of colonial-era wigs in courtrooms: Video

Despite gaining independence decades ago, nations such as Nigeria have continued to adopt these colonial symbols in their judicial systems. The practice has sparked ongoing debates about cultural relevance and practicality.

Originally worn by high court judges in Britain, the wigs were symbols of legal authority and tradition. 

In contemporary African courtrooms, however, many argue that such attire no longer reflects national identity. Critics say the tradition is outdated and unsuitable for local contexts.

In Nigeria, calls to abolish the use of wigs are growing within the legal community. 

“We cannot identify with this type of legal system attire because it is not part of our culture. It is something that is adopted, and it's also taking us back to the colony,” Emmanuel Olusola Grace, a lawyer, told Viory. 

“Each time we put all these chairs together, it makes us not look like Africans,” he added.

Barrister CJ Okereke described the wigs as a remnant of colonialism, stating, “This is one of those unfortunate legacies that were bequeathed unto us by the British.”

Aside from cultural misalignment, there are also concerns about practicality. Many Nigerian courtrooms lack adequate ventilation, making the heavy and layered court dress uncomfortable.

“The ventilation in those courts are very poor. So, it's a bit difficult to wear that type of attire, you know, suited with tie, your belt, and you'll be in an environment where there's lack of ventilation. So, that type of dressing, I would say, in that circumstance, does not really suit the environment that we are expected to dress in," said lawyer Bashir Idris.

The financial implications also add to the concern. Maintaining these colonial-era uniforms can be costly. In 2019, Zimbabwe’s Judicial Services Commission placed an order for 64 wigs from a London-based supplier, Stanley Ley Legal Outfitters, for £118,400, despite the country’s economic challenges.